THREE QUARTER GROOVED AXE FOUND IN FALL CREEK

Central States Archaeological Societies 1999 April Journal

Kelly Bastin Paragon, Indiana

It was the last day of July and it was hot, real hot! I decided to go for a bicycle ride just to cool off. I headed out of town, not even thinking about arrowhead hunting because the crops were all too tall in the fields. The only other available site I knew of had been picked over. I rounded a corner and remembered a creek not far off the road that still had a lot of water despite the fact that it had been very dry this year. So I wheeled down the farm lane to an old ford, got off the bike and lay down in the cool pool of water.

     I had hunted creek beds in the area with some success, having found several cork bottles and an assortment of points in other creeks in the countryside But I had not hunted in this particular creek before. When I got up out of the cool water, I decided to check this one out. I had not even gone twenty yards before the creek began to dry up I came across a dead owl lying in some water and thought to myself this was probably all that I would find this day, but something told me to keep going. I rounded the bend and to my astonishment, about fifty feet farther up the creek, was what I thought might be an axe. When I got a little closer I knew it was an axe! I rushed down the creek bed and looked down at the greatest axe I had ever seen.

    This three-quarter-grooved axe is 6 inches long and four inches wide. It was made from green-gray-brownish granite. It has nice polish on the bit, is well formed and absolutely perfect! The groove is 1 1/4 inches wide and is also well made. I can still remember jumping up and down, screaming and dancing because this was the best axe I had ever found. I was in heaven despite the heat.

   Then I thought I would leave it there and go get my camera, but I couldn’t leave it. I walked over, picked it up and wondered how it got here, who made it, did someone lose it, did it wash down to this spot from somewhere up stream. Since I had never found anything in the fields along side this creek, I was certain I was the first human to touch this ancient tool in thousands of years.

  I could hardly wait to get it home to clean it up and show it to my 84-year-old dad. He was equally thrilled. Then I charted it on my map and entered it into my records. The next day I asked a friend to go back with me to the spot where I found the axe, and we took photographs We were careful to lay it back in the impression it had left in the creek bed and snapped the pictures. I felt the Great Creator had truly blessed me on that day. It really made my summer.

 

A Duck Hawk Effigy Pipe

by Jim Roberson, Muscatine, Iowa

Volume 67, Number 4, October 2020 Central States Archaeological Journal

Monitor-type effigy pipe depicting a duck hawk, carved from highly polished green pipestone with small river pearl inlays for the eyes.
The Duck Hawk Hopewell pipe is 3 3/16” long by 1 ½” wide and is 2” in height. It was found near Davenport, Iowa. Photos courtesy of Terry McGuire and published with permission of the Gilcrease Museum, Tulsa, Oklahoma. The museum accession number is 6124.1144.

Figures 1 and 2. The pipe is 3 3/16” long by 1 ½” wide and is 2” in height. It was found near Davenport, Iowa. Photos courtesy of Terry McGuire and published with permission of the Gilcrease Museum, Tulsa, Oklahoma. The museum accession number is 6124.1144.

This is a monitor type effigy pipe made in the likeness of a duck hawk and is made of highly polished green pipestone, Its eyes are inlaid with small river pearls, which have partially disintegrated — probably due to the corrosive agents in the soil.

This pipe is made Of pipestone which was originally thought to have been quarried from a source in Ohio, but a source Of pipestone has since been discovered along the Rock River near Sterling, Illinois. and

A plaster cast ofthis pipe Was made by the Illinois State Museum at Springfield. Illinois. in the 1950s, The pipe is so realistic that when Dr. Thorne Duel, the museum director at that time, showed the pipe to one Of the museum ‘s Ornithologists, he immediately recognized it as belonging to a definite genus and species.

The pipe Is a realistic representation Of a hawk belonging to the Genus Falconidae and the species is identified as Faleo peregrinus anarum, occurring in North America and is known as the American peregrine falcon. or “Duck Hawk.” Its scientific name means “Duck Peregrine Falcon.”

The pipe is 3 3/16″ long by I Wide and is 2″ in height, This pipe is considered by many to be one of the finest carved monitor efflgy pipes ever found.

References: Anderson, Ferrel. 2017 Personal Communication
Solomon James J. 1953 Monitor Pipe Prehistoric American pp.50-51
Solomon James J. 1956 How Lucky Can One Get? Central States Archaeological Journal Volume 3, Number 2, October 1956, pp.66
Prehistoric Art bulletin,1953 page 51 by the Greater St. Louis Archaeological Society

An Iowa Axe

Volume 46, Number 2, APRIL 1999 Central States Archaeological Journal

Harold E. Carr, Greenfield, Iowa


About the time I think all the axes have been found, someone comes up with a find.

The axe shown here was found July of 1996 by Everett Decker in Madison County, Iowa. This is a fine classic example of an Iowa type axe, squared sides, slant groove, even the gray fine-grained granite that most of the Midwestern axes are made of; however, this axe has two unusual features that I thought worthy of notice.

Number 1: This axe has the finest deep groove of any axe I’ve found or seen, a full 1/2″ deep. I once made an axe, only once I might add, using the same hammerstones the Indians used. It was 8″ long and about the same size and thickness. I can say for a fact that the single, most timeconsuming part is that of pecking out and polishing the groove. This experiment helped me appreciate the time and skill required by the Indian in making these large, fine grooved axes.

Number 2: The bit on this axe was broken, not

by farm equipment, but by the Indian while in use.

It had evidently struck a hard, direct blow, as the bit impacted on both faces of the blade for an inch or more – just like the impact fracture on a flint point. This type of break is even more unusual on an axe, for the bit usually chips or snaps off with a clean break.

A very small part of the bit edge was still intact, indicating the axe was 7 1/2 inches when broken and probably close to original length. Even with a one-half-inch groove, the axe is 1 1/2″ thick at the groove, a well-made, heavy-duty axe.

The Indians needed to cut some rather large timbers to length in the building of their house structures. I think axes of this size could have been used for this purpose.

I often wonder who was the most disappointed, the Indian using this stone axe when broken, perhaps 2000 years ago, or the friend who found it in 1996. Regardless, I’m happy to add this fine axe to my collection.

The axe shown here was found July of 1996 by Everett Decker in Madison County, Iowa.

 

Michigan Paleo and Bayport Chert

by Todd Walterspaugh, Galesburg, Michigan

Volume 57, Number 1, January 2010 Central States Archaeological Journal

Seven Paleo points found in the state of Michigan. All are of local cherts, and three are of Bayport Chert.

Pictured above are seven Paleo points found in the state of Michigan. All are of local cherts, and three are of Bayport Chert. Of all the lithic materials utilized by Michigan’s Na­tive Americans, it is perhaps the most beauti­ful and widely distributed. It is named for the Bayport Formation where it outcrops. It is primarily found in the Northeastern area of Southern Michigan. It is found as nodules or irregular blocks generally along the river banks. The main source for the material is in Saginaw Bay, near Bayport, in Huron Coun­ty.

It has a waxy to chalky texture and is gener­ally light brown to medium grey in color. The material is high in fossil content. It also in­cludes quartz, which can appear as either white clouds or in a bulls-eye pattern. Other minerals present in the material include hematite, li­monite and dolomite. Fossils present include sponge spicules, brachipods, bryozans and colony coral.

Bayport Chert was utilized by all prehistoric time periods from Paleo to Late Prehistoric. The dominant use was during the Early Archaic Period. It was also prominent in the Middle Woodland Period. Commonly seen in use for Thebes, Adena and Snyders style points. Bayport Chert was a largely distributed material. Native Americans used it in all of Michigan’s lower peninsula. Its use extended as far away as Central Indiana, northward into northwestern Ohio, and southwestern Ontario, Canada.”Used by Permission of the Author”

The Mammoth Eaters: Very Early Man in America

by E.J. Neiburger, Waukegan, Illinois

Volume 57, Number 1, January 2010 Central States Archaeological Journal

Prehistoric mastodon, bison and horse skeletons from 13,000 YBP. Skeletons on display at the Field Museum, Chicago, IL

Figure 1. Prehistoric mastodon, bison and horse skeletons from 13,000 YBP. Skeletons on display at the Field Museum, Chicago, IL

In the Americas, early man (Paleoindi­ans and others) had many interactions with the prehistoric elephants (Probocideans) and other mega fauna that lived in large herds throughout the landscape. (Figure 1) We be­lieve that early man butchered the mammoths and mastodons because of approximately 26 known North American sites which vividly display groupings of mammoth/mastodon skeletons. Some had manmade tools (lithics) and /or butcher (cut) “marks” on the bones. Most of these sites are located in the central US along a line from Texas running north­west into Montana. These include Duewall­Newberry, Lindsey, Stolle, Cooperton, Lamb Spring, Colby, Dent and other excavations.

In the Midwest, there is a unique collection of butchered mammoths/mastodon sites along the Fox river valley in or around the southeast corner of Wisconsin. These sites are unusual because of their relatively great age ( 11,000 to 13,500 YBP [years before present] ) substanti­ated with scientifically reproducible C-14 or Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (AMS) dates, excellent bone and artifact preservation, and the large numbers of the animal remains. The uniqueness of these “butchered” bones is that they represent animals which lived 1500­2000 years earlier than the first recognized Paleolndian (Clovis) man. If it wasn’t the Clovis people, then who ate these elephants?

There are several Wisconsin area sites which are notable:

The Schaefer mammoth: (CSAJ 51 :1/04,p.10- 13; CSAJ 51:4/04,p.82-88) was found in 1992 in Kenosha County, Wisconsin.(Figure 2) It was located in a prehistoric lake bed, now a farmer’s field, excavated in 2002-3 and de­termined to be 75% complete., The bones and associated black spruce vegetation was dated (C-14, AMS) 12,200-12,500 YBP. This estimated 30 year old male mammoth was believed to have been disarticulated and butchered by humans. (Figure 3)Joints appear damaged as if they were pried apart (crushed). Bones, discovered in separate piles (evidence of sorting), showed multiple “cut” marks and breakage consistent with butchering.(Figure 4) The wooly mammoth was found in glaci­olacostrine clay and laminated peat/muck. The only stones found in association with the bones were two handmade chert flakes, a crest biface 37mm long and a small chert waste flake.(Figure 5) These tools were located un­der the pelvis and were probably used in the animal’s dismemberment 12,000+ years ago. The evidence is quite strong and leads us to conclude that this specimen was butchered by early humans. The Schaefer mammoth is on display at the Kenosha Public Museum.

HEBIOR MAMMOTH: The Hebior mammoth was found about a mile from the Schaefer site (still in Kenosha County, WI).(Figure 6) It was excavated in 1994 from the site of an ancient pond. There were two accumulations of bones (piles) found. One in the center of what was once the pond and the other located along the pond’s shoreline implying meat was removed from the carcass located in the pond, dragged to shore and then butchered. The skeleton, the largest found east of the Mississippi, was 85%­90% complete. The wooly mammoth was a male, approximately 26-30 years of age and dated (ASM of bone and spruce fragments) at 12,480-12,520 YBP. It was estimated to stand 13 feet high. Among the bones were found 4 lithic tools: two biface chert knives, a dolos­tone chopper and a sharp chert flake. (Figure 7) The bones exhibit cut marks consistent with human butchering. They include 16 “cuts” on 9 of the 194 bones recovered. One “cut” ap­peared on the left occipital condyle (neck), three “cuts” on the right forefoot and three on the right hind foot, one “cut” on the left fore­foot and one on the right humerus (forearm). The Hebior mammoth is one of the best ex­amples of paleo butchering in North America. Not only do we have most of the skeleton, clearly evident “cut” marks, accurate dating but also the tools used to dismember the ani­mal.

Schaefer Mammoth site with major portions of the skeleton. Top right: Figure 4. Butcher marks on bone from the Schaefer site.

Top left: Figure 2. Schaefer Mammoth site with major portions of the skeleton. Top right: Figure 4. Butcher marks on bone from the Schaefer site. Clear V-shaped incision covered with a patina matching other areas of the bone. Not a recent artifact. Bottom left: Figure 5. The two chert tools found with the Schaefer skeleton Bottom Right: Figure 3. Depiction of early Americans butchering the Schaefer mammoth. Note the assumed racial qualities of the individuals (Indian). Located at the Kenosha Public Museum, Kenosha, Wisconsin.

MUD LAKE MAMMOTH: The Mud Lake mammoth was found in a Kenosha County, WI marsh in 1936 during a drainage ditch project (CSAJ 53:1 1/06 p.36­38). The remains consisted of 21 bones: ra­dius, ulna (front leg) and several foot bones (manus) demonstrating numerous long, par­allel “cut” marks.(Figure 8 ) It appears that the ulna and radius was used as a “cutting board” considering the great multitude of cuts observed. The bones were dated (ASM) to 13,500 YBP thus making the Mud Lake mam­moth the oldest butchered mammoth site in North America. Subsequent digs at the lake in 2004-5 were uneventful . No lithics are as­sociated with this specimen.

The Fenske mastodon remains are comprised of one large right femur (rear leg), a vertebra and a few miscellaneous bone fragments.

FENSKE MASTODON: The Fenske mastodon remains are comprised of one large right femur (rear leg), a vertebra and a few miscellaneous bone fragments. It was discovered in Kenosha County, WI in 1919 and exhibits some “chop and cut” marks consistent with prehistoric human butchery. The mastodon was estimated to be between 25 and 45 years of age at the time of death. The ASM dating for this animal is 13,500 YBP. No lithics were associated with this specimen.

PERRY MASTODON: The Perry Mastodon (CSAJ55:1/08,p.32-33) was excavated in 1963 from a bog in DuPage County, IL, 50 miles south of the Schaefer­Hebior sites.(Figure 9 ) The male mastodon included 115 bones, the skull, tusks but not the pelvis. The animal was estimated to be a male, 30 years of age at the time of death. There were 6 large, parallel “cut” marks found on 4 rib bones which were consistent with hu­man butchering. (Figure 10 ) The specimen was C-14 dated (from wood found inside the skull) at 11,000 YBP. No artifacts were dis­covered in association with the mastodon. The skeleton is on display at Wheaton College.

Limb bones from the Mud Lake Mammoth. Note the multitude of parallel”butcher” marks on the bones.

Figure 8. Limb bones from the Mud Lake Mammoth. Note the multitude of parallel”butcher” marks on the bones.

THE MAMMOTH EATERS: Based on approximately 26 documented mammoth/mastodont -human butchery sites in the continental US, not to mention other sites in Alaska, Canada and South America, we can conclude that humans ate these animals. They butchered and ate them after hunting or salvaging activities. Until recently, the only early humans thought to inhabit North Amer­ica were the Clovis people who lived 10,900 – 11,500 years ago. There are 12 known Clo­vis-elephant kill/butchery sites. Recent exca­vations at Monte Verde, Chile (14,600YBP), Meadowcroft Rockshelter (15,200YBP), Cac­tus Hill, VA (19-22,000YBP), the above men­tioned Wisconsin area sites and others (even more ancient) establish the presence of man in the Americas significantly predating the Clo­vis peoples.

ANCIENT CAUCASIANS: Ancient skeletons with Caucasian fea­tures have been found in numerous sites in the Americas. These people’s crainometric physical types (skull shape, etc.) are definitely not American Indian. They include the fa­mous Kennewick man (WA 9,000YBP), the red haired Spirit Cave Mummy (NV), Lagoa Santa, Luzia (11,000 YBP), Wizards Beach man, NV (9225 YBP), Penon woman (Mexico 13,000 YBP), LaSena (NE 19-22,000 YBP) and others which local Indian tribes are des­perately trying to rebury under the terms of the Native American Graves and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA). These remains establish the early presence of Caucasian-like, non-Indian humans in North America.(Figures 11, 12, 13) Their presence questions the foundations and validity of many present Indian religions, oral histories and claims to land, casinos, related funding, etc.). It has become a big dollar, emotional-political issue.

Similarities in the construction of Clo­vis lithics, as compared with weapons from the Solutrian period in southern France and Spain (20,000 YBP), have suggested that European- Caucasoid people traveled west along the Atlantic sea ice/ sea mammal routes from Europe to the Americas where they populated the area, chipped Clovis points and and ate the local animals (including elephants).

Figure 9.(inset) The Perry mastodon at Wheaton College, IL. The skeleton display is half-fleshed out and is wearing a large Christmas Santa hat. Figure 10.”Butcher” cut marks on the Perry mastodon rib. Scale in centimeters.

DNA analysis of present native popula­tions, a strong source of evidence, has shown that a single population entered North Amer­ica from Siberia around 20,000-30,000 YBP. These were related to early Jomon/Ainu (Caucasoid) people from eastern Asia.(Fig­ures 12,13,14) Another group came around 5,000-6,500 YBP. These folk were related to the Eskimo, Aleut and Navajo (Mongoloid race). There are some exceptions but this data available at this time demonstrates that two great waves of people entered the Americas from Asia at different times. Occupation of lands beneath the Canadian ice sheet began around 16,500 YBP. Kennewick man (9,000 YBP) and his relatives were in the first wave.

DNA MARKS THE ROUTE: DNA analysis of living and dead popu­lations of the world can be traced, start­ing from the birthplace of man, East Africa. Each group that came from Africa possessed genetically inherited unique DNA markers called Haplogroups. These Haplogroups can be further separated into sub groups which are related not only to the first humans in Africa but are carried by their descendents up to modern times. A large population of people with one Haplogroup/ sub-type liv­ing in one area indicate that their ancestors traveled there at some period in the past. In this way, people and their ancestor’s migra­tion routes can be identified and classified.

There are 5 mtDNA Haplogroups (fe­maleline) represented in the early Americas(A,B,C,D,X). There are 2 “Y” Chromosome (male line) groups (C, Q) also represented. All of these groups are found in northern Asian/Siberian populations except Haplogroup X which is found in southern Central Asia and Europe.

The Genographic project is a DNA map­ping effort sponsored by the National Geo­graphic Society which traces DNA Haplo­group markers throughout the world. (Figure 14) There are approximately 78,000 partici­pants at this time. The DNA, supplied from subjects, are analyzed and their ancestor’s migrations (over the last 40,000 years) are dated and charted by testing and comparing the DNA of local populations along the sus­pected migration route. For a $100 fee and some cheek scrapings you can have your DNA collected, analyzed and mapped over the world and time. You may want to Google “Genographic project” for more information. There is a connection to the mammoth eaters.

Figure 11. (center)Side views of the Kennewick man and actor Patrick Stewart, both showing multiple and almost identi­cal Caucasian features. Figure 12. (left)Kennewick man’s skull showing a long head, narrow facial contour, high orbits, narrow cheekbones and other qualities used to identify him as Caucasian (oid). Mongoloid and American Indian people have round heads, wide faces, low orbits and wide cheekbones. Figure 13. (right)Upper jaw of the Kennewick man showing parabolic dental arch, narrow zygoma (cheeks) and ‘spade’ (flat lingual surface) shaped incisor teeth. Mongolian and Amer­ican Indians have an elliptical dental arch, broad zygoma and “shovel”(scooped out lingual surface) shaped incisor teeth.

THE AUTHOR’S DNA: This author is a male Caucasian (white guy) and comes from two Ashkenazi Jewish families that emigrated to North America from Latvia and the Ukraine in the early 1900s. I had a Genographic mapping done and found my ancestor’s genotype (DNA- Haplogroup Q-M242 ) to start in the Rift Valley in Africa (like all humans) 31,000-79,000 years ago (Q-M168). (Figure 15) As they moved, their DNA mutated. The ancestors traveled north to the Middle East (Q-M89) and split into two groups. One moved north west into Europe, the other moved into Afghanistan (Q-M9), then north into Russia (Q-M45) and east into Siberia (Q-M242), and then over the Bering straights to Alaska (Q-M242). The trail stops in Alaska because of a dearth of willing DNA volunteers (Native Americans-Indians) in the area.

The point is that this DNA evidence is scientifically reliable and shows that some of my, and many other non-Indian, ances­tors with the Q-M242 Haplogroup, as well as Haplogroup X, traveled from Africa to Alaska sometimes in the last 40,000 years. It sub­stantiates that, like the Kennewick man, Spirit Cave mummy and their relatives, Caucasians (e.g. my ancestors ) entered the Americas over the Bearing Straights at a time considerably earlier than the ancestors of today’s American Indians. Some of my Caucasian ancestors were genetically the first Native Americans and they came from Asia. Other relatives (my parent/grandparents) came later on ocean lin­ers from Europe. The first group were the mammoth eaters.

Figure 14. The author’s Genographic profile identifying DNA Haplogroups and the prehistoric migration routes of his ancestors from Africa into the Mid East, central Asia, Siberia and the Americas. The author in not related to any American Indians.

CONCLUSION: So who are the mammoth/mastodon eat­ers? There is clear evidence that early North Americans, whether they came from Asia or Europe, ate these animals. The many butch­ery sites in the US indicate early and frequent meals. The enormous herds of elephants which roamed the land became easy pickings; somewhat like what we see in today’s Masa Mara or Serengetti African parks where there is no problem hunting because hundreds of migrating animals drop sick or dead every day and are finished off and eaten by the local carnivores who follow the herds. Early man probably followed the herds too and patiently waited for some elephant to drop out. Those “dropouts”, which didn’t drop dead immedi­ately were easily to kill…easy pickings.

These folk were not what we term “American Indians”. In the early times, they may not have been even “Paleo Indians”. They were Asian, Caucasian-like, peoples who probably migrat­ed, interbred, died out and were repopulated by multiple waves of subsequent immigrants who peopled North America over thousands of years. How exactly this was done and by whom has yet to be refined. New archaeologi­cal discoveries and increased numbers of na­tive people participating in DNA studies will fill in this story. Think about your own contribution.

My Thanksgiving Bird

By Robert Whitehead  Kentwood, Michigan

Volume 46, Number 1,  JANUARY  1999

 A greenish banded Huronian slate birdstone. Found in Randolph Co Indiana.

Birdstone found by Robert Whitehead in Randolph County, Indiana.

In 1964 at Thanksgiving, I took my family from Grand Rapids, Michigan. We traveled to Randolph County, Indiana. We went to visit my elderly father and mother. They lived on a farm with a four- or five-acre pond near the middle of the east 49 acres. The pond had a high ridge on the east side and a lower ridge on the north side. Since childhood, when we moved to this farm, I had found artifacts in every field. As a grown man I still continued to search the best areas. The best area was the east ridge. Second best was the north ridge.Thanksgiving day was cold and blustery, and other visiting family members kept me busy. I couldn’t get away to find arrowheads. Since I was running out of time, I decided to get up early on Friday morning. I awakened as daylight was breaking in the east. It was cold and raining. I decided to put on extra clothes. I also wore my dad’s warm hunting cap and ventured out to the east ridge. With wind blowing a gale and the cold and rain, it was very uncomfortable. My eyes watered so badly all I accomplished was to wipe away the tears. I wondered aloud about my decision. “Why am I here at dawn with icicles forming on my cap’s bill? Only a nut arrowhead hunter like me would be here!” I began to head east over the ridge towards the house. I took about three steps and could not believe what I saw. It was a greenish banded Huronian slate birdstone. It was drilled at both ends, but had a chip gone from one side. I almost felt like pinching myself. It seemed like a dream. I grabbed the birdstone from the soybean row and with my heart singing headed for the warm house. I was on a high that lasted for days. The moral of the story – sometimes it pays to be a nut arrowhead hunter.